W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:10:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4CF7B6DF.6080802@mit.edu>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/2/10 10:01 AM, Brad Kemper wrote:
> The text still appears to be contradictory. Maybe I'm not seeing your updated version?

I don't know.  Where are you looking?

> What is it supposed to look like when the test doesn't fail?

Grab 
http://test.csswg.org/svn/contributors/bzbarsky/submitted/css2.1/run-in/run-in-breaking-002-ref.xht 
(the reference) and save it locally.  This is rendered identically in 
Gecko, Presto, Webkit and is the correct rendering of the test.  This 
doesn't use run-ins and doesn't depend on correct handling of inline 
breaking; it simulates a line-broken inline using two inlines with a 
break between them.

The grab 
http://test.csswg.org/svn/contributors/bzbarsky/submitted/css2.1/run-in/run-in-breaking-002.xht 
(the test) and save it locally.  Load it in your browser of choice.  It 
should look just like the other file.

I believe that all three of Gecko, Presto, Webkit fail at the moment, 
for different reasons (e.g. Gecko not supporting run-in).  Not sure 
about IE; haven't tested.

-Boris

P.S.  If I save that second file as .html, then behavior seems to be 
non-interoperable.  Gecko sees the "<![CDATA[" bit as part of the 
stylesheet data in HTML, and ignores some of the rules while Presto and 
Webkit do not.  I'm not sure whether Webkit and Presto strip it out at 
the HTML parser level or the CSS parser level, but this seems like 
something we should have a test for if we don't have one yet.
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 15:10:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT