W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 07:01:30 -0800
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F57C0CD9-CC5D-4F15-B61E-ACDFA53D95DA@gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
The text still appears to be contradictory. Maybe I'm not seeing your updated version? What is it supposed to look like when the test doesn't fail?

On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:

> On 12/2/10 3:25 AM, fantasai wrote:
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/run-in-breaking-002.htm
> This test was, in fact, pretty confused (partly because it was written before run-in inheritance was clarified, and partly because there were some copy/paste errors).  I've updated it to make sense; webkit does in fact fail the border bit (though that may be a general problem with breaking rtl inlines; I haven't checked), as does Opera.
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 15:02:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC