On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org> wrote: > As was pointed out already, you can't do that without breaking stuff. What I > can suggest though would be to add syntax like :nth-child(last[-+]an[-+]b) to > do what :nth-last-child() does right now. For example: :nth-child(last) or > :nth-child(last-2n). That is, "last" is a number that adds to the an+b > expression. I don't see any reason to do this, given that nth-last-child() already exists. ~TJReceived on Thursday, 19 August 2010 03:22:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:30 GMT