W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2010

Re: [CSS21] 10.6.1, 10.6.3 and 10.6.7 - editorial issues

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:39:47 -0700
Message-ID: <4C590B33.6000301@inkedblade.net>
To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 08/02/2010 11:44 PM, Peter Moulder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:51:48PM -0700, fantasai wrote:
>> On 08/01/2010 09:44 PM, Peter Moulder wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> I'm also content with the existing approach of "certain cases (see ...)"
>>> if instead the following changes were made [assuming I'm correct about
>>> when the rules of section 10.6.7 do apply]:
>>>
>>>    - Change "(see the preceding sections)" to
>>>      ["(see sections 10.6.4 and 10.6.6)"].
>
>> Changed "(see the preceding sections)" to
>> "(see e.g. sections 10.6.4 and 10.6.6)"
>> since it is probably not an exhaustive list.
>
> I'm not sure I understand; why do you say that?

Table cells, for example, follow the same rules when calculating
their preferred widths. And any block formatting context roots
introduced in CSS3 will also follow those rules in certain
circumstances.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 06:40:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:30 GMT