- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:45:27 +0900
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Ojan Vafai" <ojan@chromium.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:30:28 +0900, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > Also, I find the m and l accessors confusing. Can we just have a single > accessor for all types, e.g. v for value? Consider a property 'foo' that takes two values and is therefore represented by a map. Consider then that CSS changes over time. The CSS WG decides that 'foo' will now be a comma-separated list. To remain backwards compatible it will need to expose both a map and a list. That is the reason I gave it two different accessors. I am open to other solutions. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 04:46:42 UTC