- From: Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:46:33 -0500
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
> wrote:
>> Perry Smith wrote:
>>
>> > > How would you like to fill in the empty boxes?:
>> > >
>> > > http://people.opera.com/howcome/2010/ta/index.html
>> >
>> > For case 2b and 2c, I think Tab's ideas now work by adding the
>> > animation to what I call the "unadorned" selector (i.e. the foo
>> > selector in your example). I believe you would want the "play-in"
>> > concept so it plays when it transitions to that state but does not
>> > play when the page is first drawn.
>>
>> I'd love to add a column with Tab's proposals. Anther tab, so to
>> say :)
>
> 2b:
>
> foo:hover {
> play-in: bounce 1s;
> play-out: bounce 1s;
> }
I thought 2b would be:
foo {
play-in: bounce 1s;
}
foo:hover {
play-in: bounce 1s;
}
Are these two "roughly" equivalent or is there a difference?
Perry
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 02:47:07 UTC