Re: [css3-selectors] :nth-child issues

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote:
> is, pedantically speaking, incorrect since "-0" is not an integer; and
> more importantly, from the following:

Why is -0 not an integer?  It's equal to 0.

>  # When a=0, the an part need not be included (unless the b part is
>  # already omitted).
>
>  # If b=0, then every ath element is picked. In such a case, the +b (or
>  # -b) part may be omitted unless the a part is already omitted.
>
> we see that all simplifications of :nth-child(an+b) where each of a and
> b is one of 0 and -0 are accounted for, apart from the simplification of
> :nth-child(-0n+0) and nth-child(-0n-0) to nth-child(0).

Similarly, -0 is equal to 0, so these don't seem to be issues.

~TJ