- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:12:14 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
fantasai wrote: > Anton Prowse wrote: >> Issue 5e: There is no discussion in this subsection of the omission of >> the + sign before a, which is curious given that all other possible >> omissions are discussed. > > This is because the omission of + before a is covered by plus signs > on positive integers being optional. The + before the b, in the full > syntax, is considered binary operator between an and b, so saying > that an can be dropped is not enough. Pedantically speaking, a signed positive integer is not the same thing as a positive integer. (The + sign is optional before positive integers only in informal settings which blur the two.) The grammar permits a + sign before a, but neither the prose nor the examples mention it. I think there's a need for a sentence saying that the + sign is both permitted and optional. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 21:14:28 UTC