- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:42:17 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 15, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > On the other hand if fine control of how exactly text is adjusted to > fit is desired, a property with 'text' prefix would be more > appropriate. That's how I see it. So far, all the use cases seem to about that. > I have mixed feelings about that though. Fine control is good, but > then UA is discouraged from applying the best technology available > (even if some newly invented font adjustment is better, it will have > to apply 'condense' when directed). I can see that point. Maybe 'text-overflow: fit' is specific enough, and the UA is free to adjust size, glyph width, font variants, weight, tracking, etc. as it sees fit.
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 02:43:04 UTC