On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:32 PM, fantasai wrote: >> Based on the discussion at the telecon this week >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0265.html >> I have decided to change the property syntax from >> box-break: continuous | each-box >> to >> box-break: slice | clone >> >> Everyone agreed that 'slice' was a clear mnemonic. I chose 'clone' >> because each box gets its own copy of the background and border. >> It is not 'repeat' because the background and border are not merely >> repeating the result: each box gets its own complete set of border >> and background bits, which are applied to the box's own size and >> position. >> >> Since this is not a WG resolution, I am open to changing it if we >> have consensus on a better proposal. But I think it's pretty good. > > Didn't we decide that the property name should change to something like > "box-decoration-break"? We did indeed, or at least agreed that we'd use it for now unless/until someone comes up with something demonstrably better. ~TJReceived on Friday, 20 November 2009 00:00:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:28:05 UTC