- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:06:14 -0800
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > >> Brad Kemper wrote: >>> On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >>>> background: linear-gradient(magenta yellow) url(...) >>>> background: url(...) linear-gradient(magenta yellow) >>> With the current draft, these would be treated as multiple background >>> images, with the last one in the list on the bottom. >> >> See, you have made the same mistake here. >> >> According to current draft these two values of the background will do >> nothing as they are simply not valid. >> >> These are valid statements (note use of comma): >> >> background: linear-gradient(magenta yellow), url(...) >> background: url(...), linear-gradient(magenta yellow) > > You're right; I imagined a comma where there was none. You have missed this case too: background: url(...), linear-gradient(magenta yellow) It makes no sense - just waste of resources. -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 03:06:34 UTC