Re: [css3-selectors] minor question about :not()

Zack Weinberg wrote:
> fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
>>    # The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation
>>    # taking a simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo-class
>>    # itself) as an argument. It represents an element that is not
>>    # represented by the argument.
>>    #
>>    # Note: Since pseudo-elements are not simple selectors, they
>>    # are not a valid argument to :not().
> 
> I think the (excluding ...) parenthetical is still confusing, and would
> suggest instead
> 
> # The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), takes a single simple selector
> # as an argument.  It matches any element that its argument would not
> # match.
> #
> # Negations may not be nested; :not(...:not(...)...) is invalid.
> # Also, since pseudo-elements are not simple selectors, they may not
> # be used inside :not() either.

I have made the following changes:
   http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/selectors3/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.65&r2=1.66&f=h

Please let me know if this is an acceptable response to your comment.

~fantasai