W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] Various spec comments

From: Řyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:09:02 +0100
To: "Dean Jackson" <dino@apple.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u2r4pcwuru61ud@oyvinds-desktop>
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:52:46 +0100, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote:

> On 24/06/2009, at 11:12 PM, Řyvind Stenhaug wrote:

> I believe Safari/Minefield are doing what we intended. My suggested  
> change is to remove "none" from the list of allowed transform functions,  
> but leave the text in section 2 for now. That would make the "none  
> rotate(1deg)" property invalid, and match current implementations.

Sounds good (as does the rest).

>> 7) Section 7.2: The functions (should perhaps say "methods" to be  
>> consistent?) specified are "added to the Window interface", but it  
>> seems the DOM specs use 'AbstractView' instead of 'Window'. The HTML5  
>> draft has Window, though.
> I've changed to "methods". Not sure about AbstractView v Window. Which  
> do you prefer?

I thought it might be problematic to have to reference HTML5 which is only  
a draft still. If that's not an issue either one seems fine by me. Maybe  
Anne has an opinion (especially if this is to be moved to CSSOM).

Řyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 18:09:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:30 UTC