Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> wrote: > I have not been able to find any *quantification* > of the supposed practical benefits of MTX when > compared to other available, generic compression > methods (e.g., bzip2 or gzip with blocking to allow > some semblance of random access). I am not going to dig back through the entire thread to date to find it (and, for the record, I really do not appreciate your starting multiple new threads on a topic long gone into dead horse territory) but Vladimir Levantovsky posted exactly the numbers you are asking for a couple days ago. I recall 10-30% additional compression relative to gzip. zwReceived on Friday, 26 June 2009 20:48:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:47:25 GMT