Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:15:02 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> <resolution> isn't defined. > > See section 5. > >> The definition's there, but it's not linked >> up to the <resolution> notation. > > From where to where does it have to be linked? Ok, I see it. Weird to have the definition split across two top-level sections, but it's there. ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 17:22:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:15 GMT