W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2009

Re: [css3-background] should radii be capped?

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:07:07 +0200
Message-ID: <19047.21835.332934.88375@opera.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Also sprach Brad Kemper:

 > How about if when specified as a single percentage that it is a  
 > percentage of the width (or of the shortest dimension?). But when two  
 > lengths are given and one or both are percentages, then they operates  
 > on whatever side it is specified on.

This is similar to my #4, no?:

   4) We allow the '/' in the syntax to act as a switch:

     border-radius: 50%;         /* refers to width of element */
     border-radius: 50% / 50%;   /* refers to width/height of element */

   This is probably overloading the '/' notation.

 > P.S. "ellipsis" = "...", and "ellipses" = "oval or circle". But we all  
 > knew what you meant.

Yes, I know... :)

              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 18:08:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:27 UTC