W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [css3-gcpm] new draft -- including "overflow: paged"

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:42:38 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600901041542u3c6d3cado9ceb8d1433342b02@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alex Mogilevsky" <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  Overflow-x/overflow-y – it's a good point. It is possible to define what
> all combinations mean where only one of the two is 'paged' but for
> implementation I would very much rather prefer that they are required to
> both be 'paged' or not in CSS3…

I actually think overflow-x:scroll; overflow-y: paged; would be quite

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Sunday, 4 January 2009 23:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:23 UTC