W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Armenian numbering: findings, recommendations and request to CSS

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:32:10 -0800
Message-ID: <4995CABA.90604@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
CC: www-international@w3.org, HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>

Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> Also, pragmatically, it would be very cumbersome to add enumeration of
> all an alphabet's letters for every language people can think up.
> You'd have to have a different list-style-type for most languages --
> even Latin-based alphabets differ on what they think the exact set of
> letters is, and what their order is.  It seems like this would greatly
> bloat the spec.

Yeah, I think if we're going down that route we should define keywords
for the most commonly-used alphabetic orders, and introduce a functional
notation for everything else. How often do we need, e.g. upper-norwegian,
given that lists are usually less than 26 letters?


Unicode can fill in ranges, so unless there are a lot of scripts like
Ethiopic, where every language seems to have picked its own order for
the letters, this doesn't have to be that painful.

Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 19:33:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:24 UTC