W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-02-04: box-shadow and border-image

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:44:57 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600902121444s69f4cabau4553d5c0b539d53c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
> wrote:
> > So one question just came to mind: how do we deal with box-shadow
> "spread"
> > if we're using the border-images to generate a non-rectangular mask? I
> don't
> > see any reasonable option.
> I can't think of anything that wouldn't be computationally ridiculous.
>  Would it be horrible to just ignore it?

You mean ignore "spread" if border-images are present? Slightly unclean, but
perhaps the best option.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 22:45:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:24 UTC