Giovanni Campagna wrote: > 2009/2/12 Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > >> Given the following tree: >> >> G >> P >> C >> >> ... with the following styles: >> >> G { height:100px } >> P { position:relative; bottom:25%; height:0 } >> C { position:relative; bottom:inherit } > > You need to flow the document in order to find width of G, so to transform > 25% into 25px in P. Because computed values are found before used values, > the computed value of bottom in P is 25% and so the specified and computed > values in C, that lead to the used value of 0px Is the width of G relevant here? It may be that you're mistakenly thinking that percentage values for 'bottom' and 'top' are relative to the parent's width rather than the parent's height, as is the case for margin-bottom and margin-top. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.netReceived on Thursday, 12 February 2009 20:37:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:02 GMT