W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [css3-background] box-shadow and border-break

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:40:56 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600902021940o3d27a031r439667d387aa8c62@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:18 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote:

>  # If the value of 'border-break' is 'close', then each box is
>  # independently wrapped with the border and padding. The
>  # 'border-radius', 'border-image', and 'box-shadow', if any,
>  # are applied to each box independently.
>  #
>  # If the style is set to 'none', no border and no padding are
>  # inserted at the break. Otherwise, if some other border style
>  # is given, padding is added as wide as the corresponding side
>  # of the 'padding' property and a border is added with the
>  # specified style, width, and color. No box-shadow is drawn
>  # outside the broken edge, and the 'border-image' is rendered
>  # for the whole box as if it were unbroken: the effect is as
>  # though the element were rendered with no break present, and # then
> sliced by the break afterward.
> Let me know if that is clear enough. (Abspos and other content-related
> clipping is outside the scope of this spec.)

This doesn't tell me that the box-shadow for the first box of an element
might need to be drawn by the second box of an element.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 03:41:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:23 UTC