Re: [css3-selectors] Selectors is a Proposed Recommendation

On Friday 18 December 2009, Masataka Yakura wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Ph. Wittenbergh wrote:
> >> On Dec 16, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Bert Bos wrote:
> >> > The specification is here:
> >> >
> >> >    http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-css3-selectors-20091215/
> >>
> >> under 1.2
> >>
> >> [quote]
> >> 'Additional terminology is defined in the Definitions  section of
> >> [CSS21]. Examples of document source code and fragments are given
> >> in XML [[XML10] or HTML [[HTML40]] syntax. ' [/quote]
> >>
> >> I think shouldn't [XML10] and [HTML40] be linkified ?
> >
> > Yes, it's my fault: The links were broken in the editor's draft and
> > my attempt to fix them just before publication clearly failed. :-(
> >
> > I've updated the editor's draft. It doesn't seem urgent to
> > republish the PR.
>
> There's "[HTML401]" in the references section so we now have two
> separate refs to HTML4. The text above looks it doesn't need to
> specifically refer to HTML 4.0, so it should point to 4.01 instead.
>
> I also found some references point to old documents:
>
> - [XML-NAMES] is now a REC.
> - [BCP47] got an update so that it is no longer "currently
> represented by RFC 3066".
>
> Anyway, congratulations :)

All three updated in the draft of the next version.


Thanks!


Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France