W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [css3-background] cover keyword incorrectly defined

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:44:07 -0700
Message-ID: <4A82F157.2000405@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
Christopher Robert Jaquez wrote:
> It appears to me that the definition of the 'cover' keyword for
> 'background-size' is a bit off.  From
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#background-size we have "...the
> largest size [that] ... can completely cover the background...".  As
> the LARGEST size would be infinite, I'm quite sure it should read:
> "...the SMALLEST size..." there.  Not that I think that this was
> tripping up any implementers.
> 
> Apologies if this has already been pointed out somewhere but it shows
> up in the latest draft and I didn't see any mention of it in the
> archives, minutes, or a web search, although I certainly could have
> missed something.

Good catch, it's fixed in the latest Editor's Draft. :)
   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-background-size

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 16:45:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT