Daniel Schattenkirchner wrote: > I think there are some mistakes in the current publication of CSS 2.1: > > For example, the resolutions to ISSUE-80 [1] and ISSUE-88 [2] were part > of the errata, but are not included in the April 23th CR. They are not > included in the latest errata either. > > Other sections, for example the collapsing margins one seem to be > properly updated. > > [1] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-80 I'm seeing this change. The wording is not an exact copy from the issues list as it was updated in response to another issue--but it still does say that both XHTML and HTML are affected. > [2] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-88 I'm seeing "The anonymous box establishes a block formatting context." in 17.4, and the image has also been updated. Perhaps you need to reload? ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 24 April 2009 21:29:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:13 GMT