Mike Wilson wrote: > fantasai wrote: > > This was as far as I got Friday afternoon at the F2F: > > http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/specs/constants/ > > It's not very complete, but I think it captures the important points > > in the discussion. > > The discussion in the meeting notes > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0075.html > was kind of brief regarding some of the technical problems with the > original CSS Vars suggestion. > <snip> > So, could you or anyone else elaborate a little on the main technical > problems? Hi David (Baron), I was reading the meeting notes again http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0075.html and it seems this part was central to changing into the parse- time route: David: The current CSSOM only supports one value per property per declaration David: You can't do that and get the cascading order right David: And change the variables after the fact Daniel: Then these need to be constants The notes are a bit brief so I don't follow this all the way. It would be great if you could expand a little on why having changeable variables breaks the cascading order? Best regards Mike WilsonReceived on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 07:34:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:12 GMT