W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2008

Re: [page][gcpm] should a named page start on a new page?

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:45:51 +0100
Message-ID: <48CA8EAF.60103@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: marbux <marbux@gmail.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org



marbux wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:41 AM, HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:

>> This is not possible in any current proposal. I can understand you
>> don't want the blank to to have headers/footers, but do you really
>> want the page not to be counted?
> 
> More an issue of what the customer wants. During my years of printing
> books for small press publishers, some customers wanted it one way,
> some the other.  (My first career was as a typographer.)

Can you explain what benefit your customers saw in
having blank pages not counting towards "pages so far" ?

In every book that I have encountered (which is no small
number), and focussing only on those from a Western culture
(because of the reverse binding conventions of some Asiatic
languages), odd numbered pages were invariably recto,
even numbers verso.  Can you cite any instance of
a Western-culture book that does not adhere to this ?

Philip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 15:46:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:12 GMT