What I mean to say there is that the meaning of margin is to define the distance between elements. Consider this: <C> <A/> </C> <B/> If element A has bottom margin of 80px, it would normally mean that it will be at least that far from element B that follows. That may change A has a parent C with certain properties. Specified 'height' on C clearly can reduce this distance, as can 'max-height'. However having 'min-height' reduce overall size of layout seems odd. -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:05 AM To: Alex Mogilevsky Cc: Arron Eicholz; www-style Subject: Re: [CSS21] Collapsing Margins Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > For the concept of min-height, I don't think there is a precedent so far where setting min-height would make something smaller than it would be without it (which is what this test suggests)... Really? How do you see that, exactly? I don't see a way that a min-height setting using either the IE approach or the one I suggested can result in a smaller element height than otherwise. What am I missing? Unless the "something" you refer to is no the element min-height is set on? -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 10 September 2008 17:23:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:12 GMT