Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > For the concept of min-height, I don't think there is a precedent so far where setting min-height would make something smaller than it would be without it (which is what this test suggests)... Really? How do you see that, exactly? I don't see a way that a min-height setting using either the IE approach or the one I suggested can result in a smaller element height than otherwise. What am I missing? Unless the "something" you refer to is no the element min-height is set on? -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 10 September 2008 17:05:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:12 GMT