W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

RE: [gcpm] border-parts

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:30:05 -0700
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7C2F64B551D8664AAD94A28DAC37D020670A2E0C7C@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Yes, rectangular - although it has to be defined what happens when two or more first off-regions intersect (e.g. when width of left border is greater than width of first on-region of top border)

-----Original Message-----
From: Håkon Wium Lie [mailto:howcome@opera.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:53 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Subject: RE: [gcpm] border-parts

Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky:

 > One more thing... I think we talked about defining the parts
 > literally as clip region that erases portions of the border. The
 > advantage of using that definition is that it tells UA precisely
 > what is expected, especially in complex cases like elliptic
 > corners, insets, etc. However if there is a more intelligent way of
 > handling it, that definition would not allow it... I think it is
 > still worth mentioning as suggested implementation.

These clip regions would be rectangular, right?

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:30:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT