On Oct 29, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > > The 'border-parts' property [1] was discussed at the recent f2f > meeting of the CSS WG. The purpose of this property is to split the > border into parts where every other part is visible. This gives us a > flexible model to express common borders, e.g., for footnotes. > > Two additions were discussed: > > - the 'repeat()' function for repeating patterns > - the 'fr' unit as per css3-grid [2] > > I've added a description of how this could work i [1] with some > examples. Feedback welcome. > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/Overview.html#border > [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-grid/ > > Cheers, > > -h&kon > Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª > howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome > It still looks to me like you are trying to define the dashes in a dashed line, which would be awesome. But it seems kludgey to use a "solid" (not "dashed") border with dashes in it, just for the single use case of wanting a short line segment over a footnote. This is "underloading" what it means to have a dashed line (not solid at all), and overloading "border" if all you really want is a short, horizontal line segment. Has HR been deprecated? It seems to be what you are actually trying to have in your use case; an HR with a width. If there was no CSS, you would probably still want the HR there to provide the semantic meaning of "separator of different kinds of content".Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 04:55:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT