Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > Plus, conversion > of original font to SVG would in general be considered a production of > derivative work that is expressly forbidden by many (if not all) font > licenses. Much as I am (in general) on your side in this debate, I do think that that last statement is related to one of the prime causes of opposition to font DRM. If I buy the TrueType version of Linotype Times-Roman, should I really need to buy another licence if one of my applications requires instead that the font be in Type-1 format ? I believe not, just as I believe that I have every right to save a commercial DVD in DixV format /for my own personal use/, regardless of any copy-protection ("DRM") that the DVD producers have inserted to protect against such "illicit" activity. This is at the heart of the defence by the authors of DVDshrink and similar software : such software is specifically intended to allow owners to make personal backups in a more compact format, and is /not/ intended to allow illegal copies to be made and distributed. Philip TAYLORReceived on Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:47:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT