- From: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:12:25 -0800
- To: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>
- Cc: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>, www-style@w3.org
At 11:08 -0800 10/11/08, Brady Duga wrote: >On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Dave Singer wrote: >> >>If a user-agent is requested to use an embedded font that is not >>labelled as freely usable, and that font is not 'obfuscated', the >>UA MUST refuse to use the font. > >Does this imply that a local font could not be used for a local CSS >document if it is not marked as allowed for embedding? Or is this >somehow tied to the transport mechanism? ah, forgot that case. >So, only files served using a scheme that requires network access >would require this? What about other forms of >encryption/obfuscation? Would those be illegal? Specs only tell you what you are required to do; you can always do other things if you want to. -- David Singer Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 19:13:16 UTC