Also sprach David Woolley: > > I've done some soul-searching on this and reached the conclusion that > > I can live with the first part, but not the second; I don't want web > > resources to have inherent page/site restrictions. It breaks with a > > fundamental principle of the web, that web resources should be > > I don't think commercial content producers for the web consider things > like images to be web resources. They rather consider them to be part > of a compound document, which is defined either by the page HTML, or by > the whole site (leading to anti-deep linking rules, and technical > measures to frustrate deep linking). Indeed. So, if fonts get root strings, images will be next; concerned photographers would ask W3C to form a working group to address their concerns by adding a root string to images. While this, in the short term, could add some new members to W3C, the long-term effects for the web are chilling. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcomeReceived on Thursday, 6 November 2008 10:02:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT