W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: [CSS 21] overflow:hidden adjacent to a float

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:51:06 +0100
Message-ID: <483282EA.1080801@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Alan Gresley wrote:
> Boris, what websites depend on a behavior that is clearly undefined? 

Most?  Most sites are designed empirically, based on the behaviour of a 
particular browser (or are cut and pasted from such sites) rather than 
from an understanding of what the specification actually says.  Sites 
rely on undefined behaviour or are reckless as to whether or not it is 

That's precisely why there is so much demand in the web world for all 
"invalid" constructs to have precisely defined behaviour (or as I would 
see it, for there to be no invalid or undefined constructs).

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 07:50:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:36 UTC