W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: box-shadow and features

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:57:46 +1000
Message-ID: <482CDC0A.6030207@css-class.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org

Brad Kemper wrote:
> 
> On May 14, 2008, at 2:07 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
> 
>>
>> fantasai wrote:
>>> Inner Box Shadow:
>>>  http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/44 ISSUE-44
>>>  There have been quite a few comments about adding such a feature,
>>>  or at least an "inner glow" feature (which this would address).
>>
>>
>> If an inner glow/shadow is added (ISSUE-44) to CSS3, the only place 
>> for the inner (whatever?) to be placed is inside the border-box. This 
>> box would have to have a transparent background but this could not 
>> happen if shadows were not allowed to be drawn inside the border-box 
>> (ISSUE-32).
> 
> Issue 32 refers to outer shadows (like with the current box-shadow or 
> text-shadow), and whether or not the part covered by the glyph or box is 
> drawn or not. With inner shadows, the shadow is not covered by the glyph 
> or box.


Issue 32 is about box-shadow which it reads.

Resolve: Box-shadows are only drawn outside the element's border-box.


Box-shadow is different from text-shadow since shadows with text-shadow 
are seen through transparent text. Seen in Safari.

http://css-class.com/test/css/shadows/text-shadow1.htm


You keep on intermingling box-shadow with text-shadow. All I have been 
referring to is about box-shadow since that what the two treads have 
been largely about. Even the subject line in each thread is box-shadow.


When I talk of inner shadow, I only referring it to box-shadow.


Alan
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 01:10:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:06 GMT