Alan Gresley wrote: > I only said this because 3 month ago I requested to you that some of > our personal exchanges we were having were better for discussion on > the list which you ignored or just replied anyway. The attribute > value thread. That was a specific technical issue that needed to be raised for resolution by the working group. The spec was insufficiently clear on the correct behavior. >>> Firstly Daniel was supporting Paul from Microsoft. Don't you >>> consider it worthy of the CSS WG knowing what state IE8 is in. >> I don't believe I ever said anything about this issue. I have no >> idea where this claim is even coming from. If you do, please >> enlighten me. Links to sources much appreciated. > > I have already supplied this link but I will provide it again. > > http://css-class.com/test/bugs/ie/ie-bugs.htm I see nothing on that page that _I_ said. So again, where is the "Don't you consider it worthy of the CSS WG knowing what state IE8 is in" business coming from? > Well I though you were. Their is no official list anywhere to my > knowledge. That's too bad, yes. Though the first hit at http://www.google.com/search?q=css+working+group+members is pretty close. > I often forget that people don't have access to my head. :-) Yeah, keeping that in mind is pretty important. ;) -BorisReceived on Friday, 28 March 2008 20:29:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 28 March 2008 20:29:44 GMT