W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [cssom-view] small update

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:28:05 +0100
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t75w03pb64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:29:36 +0100, Robert O'Callahan  
<robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> offset* yes, because they're evil, but client* and especially scroll*  
> would be good to have more generally. After all you can apply CSS  
> 'overflow' to
> non-HTML elements.

Fair enough. Reverted for client* and scroll*.

> BTW I just noticed that in RangeView, the definition of
> getBoundingClientRect when all boxes are empty needs to be updated to  
> match the definition for elements.


> Also, the language for determining the rectangles for Text nodes needs  
> to be clarified so it's clear we make up a box for the text that's  
> selected by the range. We are not necessarily returning anything that  
> corresponds to an
> actual CSS box. Sorry because I probably wrote that in the first place  
> :-).

You did :-) Fixed.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 13:27:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:35 UTC