On Mar 8, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Justin Rogers wrote: > An at-rule consists of everything up to and including the next > semicolon (;) or the next block, whichever comes first. > <<< > > @media all { @ } > div { color: green; } > > I think the sticky point for this test case is what takes priority > in error recovery. The open parenthesis starts a block which is > owned by the @media. The closing parenthesis should close the block > because it is currently the only open block and we found a matching > closing character. We may do this while we are in error recovery > for something else like a selector though. So, does error recovery > stop once your parent block is closed? I don't think we should > trump the higher level rules of matching blocks because we find a > syntactic issue with the internals of the block itself since at- > rule's hold blocks and blocks hold any. If it can hold any, then it > also means it could hold just an asterisk and nothing more. So when > we think we are in error recovery for a selector we should also be > aware that we may have to short circuit because the block > containing the selector is closed. That seems sensible to me. When I look at "@media all { @ }" my common sense tells me that there is a closed @media block there, with nonsense inside the block that should be ignored. So it would be nice if the spec reflected my expectations.Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 03:52:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 March 2008 03:52:53 GMT