Let's clear up the wording. What are expected results when there are multiple line-throughs, underlines over overlines? Only one line at a time? Paul -----Original Message----- From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:53 PM To: Paul Nelson (ATC) Cc: L. David Baron; Steve Zilles; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [CSS21] [css3-text] Text decoration behavior Paul Nelson (ATC) wrote: >> However, both of these improvements seem like edge cases, and I'm not sure they're worth the >> complexity. How often do these cases really come up? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/text.html#lining-striking-props > > Third paragraph. > > There is concern that the description is very detailed and prescriptive. > I believe our desire is to have the best typography possible. There could > be some interpretation about what is "good typography" For example, some > might say that line-through should be done at the most readable location > across the text. Reading the current specification would seem to indicate > that the strike through would be across the middle of the line and miss > striking out superscript or subscript text. The spec prescribes that the strike-through must be a single line, not multiple lines. The vertical position of the line may vary by UA, but I strongly disagree that the number of lines should vary by UA. I'm fine with clarifying the text here. I'm opposed to changing the requirements or the expected results. ~fantasai
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:02 GMT