Paul Nelson (ATC) wrote: >> However, both of these improvements seem like edge cases, and I'm not sure they're worth the >> complexity. How often do these cases really come up? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/text.html#lining-striking-props > > Third paragraph. > > There is concern that the description is very detailed and prescriptive. > I believe our desire is to have the best typography possible. There could > be some interpretation about what is "good typography" For example, some > might say that line-through should be done at the most readable location > across the text. Reading the current specification would seem to indicate > that the strike through would be across the middle of the line and miss > striking out superscript or subscript text. The spec prescribes that the strike-through must be a single line, not multiple lines. The vertical position of the line may vary by UA, but I strongly disagree that the number of lines should vary by UA. I'm fine with clarifying the text here. I'm opposed to changing the requirements or the expected results. ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:52:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:02 GMT