W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2008

Re: issue with url() in CSS 2.1 grammar

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:40:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4864DFA3.6020304@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>> The empty string is a valid resource identifier [...]

> The problem is that a URL is not supposed to be zero-length...

These two statements are at odds with each other,
and at most one can be correct.  Given the concept
of a base URL, I /suspect/ that the former is more
accurate, but I cannot substantiate this as I write.

Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 12:40:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:37 UTC