W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2008

Re: [CSS 2.1: 9.4.1] Block Formating Context - clarification of term propagated

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:26:17 -0500
Message-ID: <484D67B9.7070707@mit.edu>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org


Alan Gresley wrote:
> If so, then my understanding of the word propagated used in the spec 
> isn't correct. I understand propagated to mean inherited.

It doesn't.  At least not in the sense in which the spec uses the word "inherited".

-Boris

Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 17:27:15 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew Fedoniouk: "Re: [css3-mediaqueries] Width/Height Clarifications"
Previous message: L. David Baron: "Re: [css3-mediaqueries] Width/Height Clarifications"
In reply to: Alan Gresley: "Re: [CSS 2.1: 9.4.1] Block Formating Context - clarification of term propagated"
Next in thread: Ph. Wittenbergh: "Re: [CSS 2.1: 9.4.1] Block Formating Context - clarification of term propagated"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:07 GMT