W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: [CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?

From: Christof Hoeke <csad7@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:20:33 +0200
Message-ID: <488E0DF1.4040501@t-online.de>
To: Jens Brueckmann <jens.brueckmann@gmail.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Jens Brueckmann wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Christof Hoeke <csad7@t-online.de>:
>>> As you proposed, flagging properties with a vendor extension as warnings
>>> (or maybe informative notices) instead of errors might be a good idea
>>> though. New profiles or an option could also be created (e.g., "CSS3 with
>>> Vendor Extensions" or an "Allow Vendor Extensions" check box). None of this
>>> would help with properties that lack vendor extensions though.
>> vendor extensions allowed option is great.
> 
> How would the validator be able to validate these, without knowing
> which values a vendor-specific property takes:
> 
>    -moz-opacity: 12;
> 
> or
> 
>   -moz-opacity: green;
> 
> Should the validator ignore values of vendor-specific properties?

As long as the values are parsable with the existing grammar this would 
be reasonable I think, yes.
Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 18:21:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT