Re: [CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?

Jens Brueckmann wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Christof Hoeke <csad7@t-online.de>:
>>> As you proposed, flagging properties with a vendor extension as warnings
>>> (or maybe informative notices) instead of errors might be a good idea
>>> though. New profiles or an option could also be created (e.g., "CSS3 with
>>> Vendor Extensions" or an "Allow Vendor Extensions" check box). None of this
>>> would help with properties that lack vendor extensions though.
>> vendor extensions allowed option is great.
> 
> How would the validator be able to validate these, without knowing
> which values a vendor-specific property takes:
> 
>    -moz-opacity: 12;
> 
> or
> 
>   -moz-opacity: green;
> 
> Should the validator ignore values of vendor-specific properties?

As long as the values are parsable with the existing grammar this would 
be reasonable I think, yes.

Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 18:21:21 UTC