W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: [CSS21] Are vendor-specific extensions invalid?

From: Jens Brueckmann <jens.brueckmann@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:57:18 +0200
Message-ID: <fe03a57b0807280357s4f8767e0r11bef9f34aa294fd@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

2008/7/28 Christof Hoeke <csad7@t-online.de>:
>
>> As you proposed, flagging properties with a vendor extension as warnings
>> (or maybe informative notices) instead of errors might be a good idea
>> though. New profiles or an option could also be created (e.g., "CSS3 with
>> Vendor Extensions" or an "Allow Vendor Extensions" check box). None of this
>> would help with properties that lack vendor extensions though.
>
> vendor extensions allowed option is great.

How would the validator be able to validate these, without knowing
which values a vendor-specific property takes:

   -moz-opacity: 12;

or

  -moz-opacity: green;

Should the validator ignore values of vendor-specific properties?

-- 
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 11:05:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT