W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Applying SVG properties to non-SVG content

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:28:19 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600807131928w27435c33g5dc0f9664e8f0507@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:

> From a logistical point of view, the obvious time and place to continue
> this discussion is at the TPAC in October.  And, of course, on this thread,
> in the meantime.
>

I'm unlikely to be able to attend the TPAC, unfortunately.

>
>
>  A different problem is how to set the priorities. Compared to all the
>> other work being done in SVG and CSS, how high a priority is this and how
>> many resources are available for it? Should it be done in the next two years
>> (at the cost of what other work?), can it wait a year or two, should it not
>> be done anytime soon, or not be done at all...
>>
>
> Personally, I see this as a high priority.  I think it should be started in
> a timeframe that allows Mozilla, Opera, and Safari to include this in
> upcoming product releases.
>

That would be good. It needn't take long.


>
> CDF WG might be a good place for this to be specified, or we could form a
> new joint Task Force.
>

Both of those sound less than ideal. How about if I split it up so that the
clip-path/filter/mask extensions belong to the SVG WG and the paint-server
backgrounds belong to the CSS WG?

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 02:28:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT