W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2008

Re: <br> and generated-content

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:55:29 -0400
Message-ID: <486D0481.9090803@mit.edu>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Alan Gresley wrote:
> Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> One of the first lessons of browser implementation is that authors 
>> cannot be trusted.
> 
> Roc, which authors are you referring to.
> 
>  1. Code valid CSS and HTML.
>  2. Code invalid CSS and valid and HTML.
>  3. Code valid CSS and invalid HTML.
>  4. Code invalid CSS and HTML.
>  5. Code invalid and propriety HTML.

I think I can speak for Robert here in saying "every single one of them".

> You want to cater for the full spectrum, even those authors that 
> ignorantly mangle there code into knots.

Indeed.

> So you are saying that the spec authors duty is to have CSS rendering 
> defined.

Yes, indeed.

> This is a double edge sword where the author coding by best practices 
> are penalized.

I'm not sure I follow this at all.

-Boris
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 16:57:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:10 GMT