Re: [css3-background] background-size vs background-stretch

I would agree on background-fill or background-image-fill over
background-sizing.

To me background-sizing or background-size relates more to the box element
then the actual image or content that is in it. As a designer
background-fill will always imply to the actual image or colour used in the
background box.

*g

On Jan 19, 2008 3:53 PM, Molly E. Holzschlag <molly@molly.com> wrote:

>
> If we agree that background-size essentially means "take this background
> image and make it fill this much of the background area"
>
> Sounds like background-image-size to me.
>
> background-fill or background-image-fill would still make sense from a
> design perspective in my opinion. Definitely more so than background-size
> which makes me simply think I can literally size the background any way I
> want, which clearly isn't what we're expressing here.
>
> :)
> M
> -=-
> Molly E. Holzschlag
> Web Standards and Practices Education and Outreach
> Molly.Com, Inc.
>
> http://molly.com/
>
>
>
>