W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [CSS21] The grammar of url() token

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:30:07 +0000
Message-ID: <47C51F8F.4050402@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org



fantasai wrote:

> A better future extension would be URL fallbacks, imo:
> 
>   background-image: url(image.svg, image.png, image.gif, image.jpg)

In such an example, I would regard the comma as
both unexceptionable and natural; the comma is
a natural separator for equals, but where -- as
in Bert's earlier example -- the latter part
is unrelated to the former, more obvious punctuation
seems to me to be required.

Philip TAY:LOR
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 08:30:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:01 GMT