W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2008

Re: no-cascade proposition

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:53:49 +0000
Message-ID: <493E240D.5010001@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

Niels Matthijs wrote:
>> or do you want to prevent document stylesheets from being applied
> within a given subtree of the document?
> 
> That's what I was aiming for. To be able to stop css from being applied
> from a given point in the document tree. The theory behind it being that

This is basically the transclusion issue.

However, I would point out that for the most common web page use of 
included content, syndicated material, one wants the style to match that 
of the containing page, not the syndicator's style.

In those cases where that is not appropriate, it would seem to me that 
the better construction is to use an HTML object element to contain the 
included material.


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2008 07:54:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:17 GMT