W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Updated versions of Apple's transforms/animations/transitions proposals

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:36:08 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600804131436k540751c5j10771495f9c4aeb7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David Hyatt" <hyatt@apple.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:53 AM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:

> On Apr 12, 2008, at 7:49 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>  The issue at the end of section 2.5 is important. A useful experiment for
> > evaluating animation proposals is to try to implement the OS X dock's
> > behaviours, and that issue comes up immediately --- I gave up on SMIL when I
> > couldn't figure out how to handle that :-).
> >
> >
> A dock implemented using CSS animations:
>
> http://www.sitepen.com/blog/2008/03/28/svg-css-animations-fisheye-fun/
>

That hits the issue in 2.5, right? If the :hover state is removed before the
element has achieved its full size, the element will instantly take its full
size (ugh!) and transition back to normal.

I was also thinking about additive animations. I guess that's not a huge
issue since in CSS, style rules applying to the same element always override
one another, rather than add, so authors who need additive effects need to
introduce extra elements anyway. Still, might be worth noting somewhere that
additive effects are a non-goal since IIRC SMIL has them.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Sunday, 13 April 2008 21:36:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:05 GMT